🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.