🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that may create several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

This decision comes amid a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Typically, boundary revision takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several more conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House leader argued the court had another time shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.